Geotecnica Di Lancellotta Pdf lancellotta leonardo geotecnica Lancellotta, R. (2006).. "J. Amer. Soc. Civil Eng." v 90 n 7 p 2045–2055. PDF A. De Grazia, R. Lancellotta, M.M. Lopatin, D. Ruggiu and R. Sesti. (2004). . "J. Amer. Soc. Civil Eng." v 90 n 7 p 2045–2055. References External links Homepage at Politecnico di Torino Homepage at IsAR Category:1963 births Category:Living people Category:Italian civil engineers Category:Polytechnic University of Turin alumni Category:Polytechnic University of Turin facultyThese are a few notes I took while trying to decipher the "How to Act" thread, which I found very interesting. Most of the answers can be summarized in this way: "Suck up, smile, be humble, 'give respect where it is due', take the blame (where it is yours), and don't give a damn about what other people think of you." Now, I have found out that some of these things, although they are stated in such an "un-informative" manner, do have some real-world value. So, let me tell you how I would go about applying them to my life. First of all, how do I suck up? I would generally try to come across as humble and kind, but in an unassuming way. I would try not to raise my voice or lose my temper. I wouldn't speak unless I was asked a question, and when I was speaking I would try to use a reasonable voice and tone, rather than yell or shout. Also, I would try to be respectful towards others, even if they are being rude to me. So, all in all, it's an unassuming act of sucking up, which I should probably do more often. Second, how do I smile? Well, I would try to smile (see above) when others are doing something nice for me, I would try to smile when I am speaking (see above), I would try to avoid raising my voice or getting angry (see above), and I would try to avoid making statements that would make me look bad (see above). Third, how do I behave? I would try to take the On Sep 15, 2016, M. Battaglio, V. Siriano, F. Vaglieri and R. Lancellotta published A quantitative measurement of. diffusion potential differences among. different substrates for isotopic labeling of soil carbon. (...). References External links Fondazioni Category:1941 births Category:Living people Category:People from the Province of Alessandria Category:Italian geotechnologists Category:University of Torino alumni Category:University of Pisa alumni Category:University of Modena and Reggio Emilia faculty). There is a lot of thought-provoking stuff in this book, but I think the most interesting section is the last chapter where we see the author's broader vision for the future of programming language design. He puts forward a list of priorities for future features: Don't make small mistakes (e.g. casting) a mistake. Make errors less dangerous (more on this later). More expressivity. Make user interface more efficient. Make the mental process of solving problems more human. More typographic niceties. More customizability. I'm just skimming the surface of some of the ideas, but I think it's fairly likely that any of these would have merit. My personal preference would be more power to the user interface, but at least the idea that more expressivity would make programming feel more human is intriguing. The author is also quite familiar with the philosophy of design, and refers to Donald Norman and the "general principles of design" in the first chapter. He also makes a passing reference to Ian Stewart in the very first paragraph. Every chapter of this book has a short introduction at the front, and the last chapter has a summary. A lot of the advice is very broad and contains no concrete code, and perhaps that is intentional. For example, the authors suggest Make errors less dangerous. This makes it harder for the programmer to get into dangerous situations. This seems like it might be a bit of a straw man argument, since I'm sure experienced programmers regularly make mistakes that are surprising, and I know I have. But that is beside the point. The authors have a very specific goal in mind here, which is to make programming feel more "human". They argue that too much abstraction results in programming that is perceived as less "human", and that humans 54b84cb42d
Related links:
Comments